Thanks to a post I read a couple of weeks ago, I’ve been checking up on what diverse travellers consider genuine and real. Conclusion: there are as many definitions as there are travellers around the world.
There are those who measure authencity by the manner in which they travel and others who do so counting the number of countries they’ve visited. For some, backpàcking is the only way to go, sleeping in hostels and eating local cuisine being part of the package. Still others like Helen Todd consider that keeping it real is all about attitude.
“For me, the difference between a traveler and the tourist is the mindset. I consider myself a traveler but when I go to Miami in a couple of weeks, I will definitely be a tourist, with little care beyond my tan and what book to bring“. Written by Helen Todd at her blog.
Yet there are some who find this debate pointless. Dan from Voyagner, for example, believes that the most important thing is not to go after real as if it were the Holy Grail, but to just do whatever pleases you and forget about attaching any labels to the question.
“The problem is we all have a different ideas about what makes a good traveler but sometimes it’s like comparing chalk and cheese. I’m not trying to be diplomatic, if you want to see the world not just for it’s sights, you have to be involved in what you find around you, otherwise what is the point? Who cares if you eat at Mc Donald’s, the question is are you really getting what you want out of your travels?”. Written by Dan at his blog.
At trourist, as you know, we have our own idea of what real travelling means. We feel real is living those kinds of moments in those kinds of places which make local folk happy.
What are your thoughts on the subject? What do you think real travelling is all about?
Photo by Daniel Bachhuber







by Imanol Abad
"Gracias por compartir más cosas que hacer en las ciudades. Una que no había incluído en mi lista"